>km1h @ juno.com wrote (replying to me):
>
>>>Let's try to stay with detailed circuit analysis, and not fall back to
>>>vague arguments based on "lots of RF around".
>>
>>I would love to if you would be so kind to tell me exactly what
>>transpires during a Big Bang internal gas arc Ian. After all these
>>months there have been nothing BUT vague comments.
>>
>>As far as my comments about RF floating around I feel it deserves serious
>>consideration and not a flippant put-down.
>
>Sorry, Carl, I didn't mean that to come across as flippant. I was just
>trying to encourage everybody not to back away into generalities when
>things become hard to explain.
>
>Since the transients that we're talking about are close to unmeasurable
>in practical terms, the only tools we have left are detailed analysis of
>the possible mechanisms and their effects. ... ...
amen, Ian
- If one suspects a gas arc was responsible for the 'big bang', and one
finds gas in the tube, it seems likely that there was a gas arc.
However, if there is no gas in the tube, maybe there was no gas arc at
the time of the 'big bang' event. And if the bias zener and the VHF
suppressor resistor are kaput, perhaps the cause of the 'big bang' was an
intermittent VHF oscillation.
cheers
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|