Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] parasitic suppressors

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] parasitic suppressors
From: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 18:24:14 EST
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:03:58 +0000 "Ian White, G3SEK"
<G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk> writes:
>Rich Measures wrote:
>>If the paper is unsigned, receiving a copy of it would 
>>not reveal the author.
>
>It doesn't matter which individuals first wrote the bulletin, 
>commented
>on the draft, authorized its release and so on...  You have to accept
>that the statements in the Application Bulletin as published represent
>the views of the EIMAC company. 
>
>You can't try to pick-off and discredit individual EIMAC employees one
>by one.



A statement that needed to be made Ian.....Thanks.

73   CArl   KM1H



>
>73 from Ian G3SEK          Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
>                          'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
>                           http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>