>
>Carl wrote
>> That does seem a bit high but what effect would it have in a
>> suppressor ?
>> I have never been clear on that point since it appears that a minute
>> amount of inductance is compensated for by the L that is selected.
>>
>Indeed, why would this resistor have to be non-inductive?
>
to achieve a staggered-resonance effect in the two branches.
>Some people use resistive inductors to improve their surpressors, so why
>not use inductive resistors?
Because the R is in the low-L branch - where less L is better.
>............
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|