km1h@juno.com wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 09:54:09 -0800 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
> writes:
> >
> >>
> >>At 01:20 AM 10/18/98 -0800, you wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>The amps reflector has been and continues to be a source of useful
> >>>>information to me.I just wish I had some way of filtering out all
> >this
> >>>>one-upmanship crap that goes on daily.C'mon guys you know who you
> >are
> >>>>cut it out please!
> >>>>Can we start a petition :)
> >>>>
> >>>>73 de Conrad G0RUZ
>
> Seems to be another attempt at PC IMO. There are enough attempts on
> individual freedoms and expression without it here also.
> Keep it clean and let it all hang out.
>
> >>>
> >>>This is an unavoidable part of debating, esp. with males. High
> >power
> >>>linear amplifiers are more complex machines than they seem, so there
> >are
> >>>bound to be an ample supply of opinions floating about. . However,
> >in
> >>>time, science, mathematics, and reason will prevail.
> >>>- cheers, Conrad.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Rich...
> >>
> >>Hi Rich and Conrad
> >>
> >>Yes there is a considerable amount of One-upmanship on this list.
> >Some of
> >>it productive, while much of it destructive. What is NOT called for
> >is
> >>personal attack.
> >
> >- I draw one line at fabrication of "information". For instance,
> >during the grate parasitic suppressor debate, one of the combatants
> >tried
> >it and got caught red-handed. I draw another line at double-speak.
> >Saying one thing in a public debate and a very different thing in
> >private
> >e-mail pisseth me off in no small amount.
>
> Amen Rich. I enjoy our occassional bitching but it always is courteous
> and often productive !
>
> What several of the reflector police fail to realize is that sometimes a
> posting is due to a personal vendetta that had nothing to do with this
> reflector....such is the case with a post by one individual. I just
> considered the source and chose to ignore it.
>
> 73 Carl KM1H
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
My God did no one even bother to read the smiley?The thing is the two
main protagonists are the very two who defended this "debating?" the
most.Of course an amplifier is a complex beast that is unquestionable
and without differing opinions there would be no advancement. This is
probably a pointless thread,I just had to let it all hang out!
I don't suppose that it will make any difference though.I am genuinely
sorry if I've insulted any of your sensibilities and I did not intend to
be any kind of policeman but I did have a side bet with someone about
the reaction!Thanks for the ride and now back to the technical debate...
Very :) :)
73 de Conrad G0RUZ
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|