To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST |
From: | mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike) |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:01:01 -0500 |
If this is true then it's an example of the dumbing down I referred to. A hobby need not be taken seriously by our government. Mike N2MG > At 10:07 AM 1/27/99 -0500, James D. Duffer wrote: > > > > > >HOBBY HOBBY HOBBY......are you sure? Is that the definition and > >purpose of the Amateur Radio Service?? Review Part 97. > > > >73, > >Jim, WD4AIR > > > > Jim there was a recent ruling by the FCC that reclassified Amateur > Radio > strictly as a Hobby. (within the last 6 months) So unless your copy of > 97 > has been recently revised the definition and purpose you are reading > is out > of date an no longer applicable. > > 73s > > Bob K1TA > > -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST, Jon Ogden |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST, Arthur Moe |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST, Jon Ogden |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] ARRL and QST, Arthur Moe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |