No. We see it the same way Jon. John F was saying that 105 C caps provide
less performance and I agree. The "red herring " comes from the frequent
recommendation to "buy the 105 C caps", implying that they're better than
the 85 C caps no matter what. Nothing wrong with 105C caps as long as you
understand the performance that accompanies a cap with that rating.
I may not have expressed myself as well as I could have with that post.
Phil
At 10:41 PM 3/4/99 -0600, you wrote:
>>I think John's point is that higher max. operating temperature rating seems
>>to automatically imply some other performance enhancements over an 85 C
>>rated cap, and I can't see that it does.
>
>Phil, I think John said the opposite (at least how I read it). That is,
>the 105C caps have less performance than the 85C caps. That would only
>make sense. Something always has to give when you improve a particular
>spec. I've got people asking me all the time for specs that are nearly
>physically impossible on parts I sell. I tell them "something has to
>give!"
>
>73,
>
>Jon
>KE9NA
>
>
>-------------------------------------
>Jon Ogden
>KE9NA
>
>http://www.qsl.net/ke9na <--- CHECK IT OUT! It's been updated!!!!!
>
>
>"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|