Amps
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[AMPS] Follow Up on the SB-220 Follow UP

from [Gilmer, Mike] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Follow Up on the SB-220 Follow UP
From: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:08:52 -0500 
Seriously -
 
> 
> ?  The Challenger o-rings were supposed to be plenty ok in cold
weather.  
> 

Who said that, engineers or the executive management?

> 
> ?  A big-bang event happens in a 2-holer..  The suppressor resistors
are 
> 100 ohm +/- 5% units.  The resistors appear to be in mint condition. .

> Each resistor is virtually shorted by a few turns of #16 copper wire.

> The measured resistance of the suppressor resistors was over 400 ohms.

> I was there.  I made the measurements.   
> 

Did you have the chance to measure the resistors BEFORE the big bang?
Only way to know for sure.

Mike

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [AMPS] Follow Up on the SB-220 Follow UP, Rich Measures
Next by Date:  [AMPS] Instant ON.., Jon Ogden
Previous by Thread:  [AMPS] Follow Up on the SB-220 Follow UP, Walter Fairclough
Next by Thread:  [AMPS] Follow Up on the SB-220 Follow UP, Jon Ogden
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]