Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] parasitic suppressors

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] parasitic suppressors
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 04:52:58 -0700


>
>The first point that we need to realsie is that you only get the parasitics
>if the Barkhausen criteria are satisfied at any particular frequency.  This,
>as Ian says, derives from the factors of gain and phase shift. 
>
>I still don't see any answer as to why the Q of a resistance wire inductor
>should actually be less as frequency increases than a parallel R-L
>combination 

?  It isn't. 

>which provides an impedance asymptotic to the resistance value.
>Which is another way of saying that the impedance tends to the value of the
>shunt resistance.

?  The frequency of oscillation is pretty much fixed.  
In a typical parasite suppressor, roughly equal vhf currents flow through 
R-sup and L-sup.   
Parallel R-L circuits are said to have an admittance. Series R-L circuits 
are said to have an impedance.  .  
>
>In these measurements of suppressors, what was the value of the shunting
>resistance? 

?  100 ohms.  

>If there wasn't one, all bets are off, since you are comparing
>apples and bananas.
>
-  later, Peter


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>