Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] slam tally

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] slam tally
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 09:29:26 -0700


>
>Rich says;
>
>       >?  Would you consider it bad form to state that alleged facts were 
>       >contradicted by the personnel dept. of the former employer?
>
>Rebuttal of facts is an accepted part of debate. To say that evidence is
>available to rebut a set of facts stated by one of the parties, and to
>produce that evidence is one thing - and is acceptable: but if one said that
>'these facts presented by Mr. X are lies and I'm going to prove it', I'd
>class that not only as unacceptable, but purposely inflammatory and
>insulting.
>
It's all in the grate debate archive.  If anyone would like to RX a 
one-piece searchable copy, an e-mail request to yours truly is all that's 
needed.    Chunks are available as well.  State the area of interest, and 
I'll snip the rest.  


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>