Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Poor science

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Poor science
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 05:40:28 -0700
>
>Hi Rich,
>
>Nice try at pulling something out of context, but what I said was 
>exactly true.
>
N7WS's measurements showed otherwise.  
>
>> >Please copy and repost where I said that.
>> >
>> Ä From: w8jitom@aol.com
>> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
>> Subject: Re: Good source for amplifier tips
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>> Date: 24 Nov 1996 03:34:24 GMT
>> Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364) (1.13)
>> Lines: 110
>> Message-ID: <19961124033600.WAA09484@ladder01.news.aol.com>
>> References: <measures-ya023180002211960639420001@news.vcnet.com>
>> NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news.aol.com
>> X-Admin: news@aol.com
>> X-Newsreader: AOL Offline Reader
>> >......
>> ''I think though we can safely conclude making the coil out of nichrome
>> mainly lowers HF Q, NOT VHF Q''. ..... 
>
>What I said is above is perfectly correct, because we were 
>discussing a conventional parallel R/L suppressor.
>

the long excursion on the wide river in the Land of Pharoahs continues.  

cheers, Tom

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>