Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Poor Science

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:08:16 -0700
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: measures <2@vc.net>
>To: Tom Rauch <W8JI@contesting.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: 06 March 2000 15:52
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science
>
>
>snip
>
>>>I think someone has a parasitic fetish.
>>>
>>Mr. Rauch's attempt to introduce a sexual angle into this entangle is
>>quite interesting.

>The original (17th century) use of 'fetish' relates to excessive devotion to
>objects or ideas, or belief in magical powers, and doesn't have any sexual
>connotation.

Welcome to the 21st century, Steve.   If you are ever in LA, stop in at 
the Pleasure Chest  sex-toy store  in Hollywood, and check out the 
fettishes.  .  .  
>
later, Steve

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>