It seems to me that refusing to perform repair work,
whether warranty or not, without proof of a ham
license is a reasonable voluntary action that the amp
makers could engage in. It wouldn't all of the
problem, of course, but it would probably stop some of
it.
I think the only real solution is aggressive
enforcement.
Mike wy6k
--- "George K. Watson" <watson@epiloglaser.com> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, there is no way to police this
> activity effectively as there
> would always be amateur licensee/CB enthusiast
> crossovers to defeat Mr.
> Rauch's
> proposed solution. There is probably no solution
> that does not involve
> individual
> lawbreakers ceasing the activity either voluntarily
> or through extreme
> dissuasion.
>
> I would not really mind this activity if it stuck to
> polluting its own pool:
> 11m,
> but there are many who ignore the frequency
> boundaries and creep up to 10m
> and down
> to 12m. Fortunately the harmonics from dirty 11m
> activity only pollute the
> 6m band when
> the skip is in (theoretically).
>
> 73,
> George K. Watson
> K0IW
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:
> http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:
> amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|