>
>It sounds like QST is now run by magazine editors for
>the benefit of the league rather than the benefit of
>the members of the league.
>
Wilson reportedly rules the roost.
>I agree that the act of allowing manufacturers
>unfettered smearing rights is disgraceful.
The manufacturers did no smearing.
>This was
>handled in a very unprofessional manner that caters to
>the interests of advertisers and, therefore, the
>league's revenue.
>
As I understand it, the Corp. is not in very good financial condition. I
would be willing to pay double the QST subscription rate if there were no
advertising. Consumers Union is right.
cheers
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|