>
>Some corrections to my own post of last night- added to relevant parts,
>after some snipping to cut the un-needed parts out
>
>
>t 09:40 AM 9/13/00 -0400, I wrote:
>>> All the modeling in the world will never convince Rich that
>>> there is no parasitic. All the modeling in the world will not convince Tom
>>> that there is.
>>
>>I've never said there CAN'T be parasitics, please don't put words
>>into my mouth.
>
>Tom is right- I should have said that Tom apparently doesn't think the
>damage reported is due to parasitics, alone, and Rich appears to think that
>is the MAJOR cause. Remember- this is MY opinion and interpretation- I
>cannot really put those words in their mouths.
>>
>>I've said VHF parasitics on the frequencies Rich speculates can't cause
>the damage he claims.
>
>I agree- from all I have seen (Richs pictures included) I consider it a
>non-proven speculation that parasitics did it.
>>
A bandswitch intermittently arcs during 80m operation. The VHF
suppressor resistors are found to be damaged. Did 80m RF damage them?
cheers
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|