>Here is a repeat, Please let it be:
>
>OK enough AGAIN !!!!!!!!
>Please AMPLIFIER related postings ONLY.
>NO more personal attacks or what so ever,
>same count for CB issue.
Amen to that, Will! I quickly stopped reading it and started clicked
Delete.
>I am sure there are plenty of reflectors to vent those issues.
This debate was hatched on the rec.radio.amateur newsgroup. Perhaps the
time has come to return to the nest.
Removing the human element/ "whatsoever" completely will assuredly make
AMPS as dry as Saturday's toast. On the other hand, I don't think we
need another Jerry Springer show.
When I first came here (thanks to a tip from Carl H.) , within a few
days, the moderator telephoned me and said he was receiving complaints
about me. Virtually all AMPS group moderators have apparently received
complaints about me from the opposition camp. My ISP even gets
complaints from turkeys who want to get me kicked off the Internet. It
is my opinion that all complaints to the AMPS moderator should be posted
under a Complaints thread. The current system is too much like the
Spanish Inquisition.
??? Notice -- Anyone on the AMPS mailing list who does not want to
receive any e-mail from me - please say so. If you would like to be
included, please say so. thank you.
>NO FLAMES!
>73 Will, K6NDV
>Administrator AMPS reflector
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-amps@contesting.com [mailto:owner-amps@contesting.com]On
>Behalf Of measures
>Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 2:06 AM
>To: Steve Thompson; AMPS
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Great debate
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bill Turner <w7ti@jps.net>
>>To: AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>Date: 15 September 2000 01:02
>>Subject: Re: [AMPS] 8877 test results.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:41:51 -0400, Michael O. Hyder wrote:
>>>
>>>>I've been reading some of this Grate Debate II. It is beginning to sound
>>>>like Alchemy 101.
>>>_________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>I've been away from the reflector for about a year and a half. The
>>>Grate Debate seems to still be in full swing.
>>
>>
>>I'm sure for some that it really does 'grate'. Is the misspelling a
>>deliberate pun?
>>
>Yes.
>
>
>Here's a fun excerpt from a letter that Mr. Rauch wrote to a friend of
>mine on 1-16-1996.
>----------------
>"... ln the interests of being fair to Mr. Measures, I would be willing
>to debate him in any organized mutually agreeable forum. The advantage to
>Mr. Measures is the freedom to present his views and answer any
>challenges. The advantage to builders is they could follow both
>viewpoints and decide which view they accept. The advantage to opposing
>side is they will finally have an opportunity to fully debate some of Mr.
>Measure's theories.
>This is a purely technical issue. I insist all personal accusations be
>left out. "
>
>[delightsome]
>
>Thank You,
>
>Tom Rauch, W8JI"
>------------------------------------
>
>cheers, Steve
>
>- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>end
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|