>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "J. Leon Pringle, Jr and Audrey S. Pringle" <w5na@megagate.com>
>To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 9:22 PM
>Subject: [AMPS] Expulsion policy on AMPS
>
>
>> This reflector is basically privately owned and administered by a
>> board moderator for the board owner.
? What "Board"? I thought this was a computer running the Majordomo
mail-list application.
>> If those that want to create a voting block to kick some one off need
>> to buy their own board if they don't like the way this one is being
>> administered.
>>
>> The man that owns the toys writes the rules.
? Apparently, there are no written rules.
>> and if someone doesn't
>> like it, they need to buy their own reflector and run it the way they
>> want. This is not a union hall and why should the moderator have to
>> get a vote of posters in order to wack someone's posts.
? The last time I was expelled, my sin was questioning the technical
utterances of a self-appointed amplifier "expert". (see 9/1994 QST,
p,72) Subsequently, the "expert's" lap-dogs mounted a letter writing
campaign to the moderator, kevetching about me. (no pun intended)
>> posting is not a right but instead a privilege for so long as one doesn't
abuse it.
>>
? It is my opinion that techno-blather on the AMPS mailing-list should
be discussed extensively. If members get the jackboot for doing so, the
AMPS reflector/mailing-list is destined to become a source of derision.
cheers, Leon
- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|