----- Original Message -----
From: "W9GT" <w9gt@home.com>
To: "Frank Ayers" <w2fca@qsl.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] Bypassing Screen of 4cx800a for 50 MHz
> I was wondering the same thing about HF use of the 4CX800A. Is it
critical
> to use the Svetlana socket with built-in screen bypass, or can you get by
> using a "loctal" socket, which fits and a conventional bypass capacitor or
> multiple capacitors? I can see that this is a consideration for VHF, but
I
> wonder if it is critical up to 30 MHz. Anyone tried it?
>
> 73, Jack, W9GT
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Ayers" <w2fca@qsl.net>
> To: "W6NQ" <w6nq@rfparts.com>; <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [AMPS] Bypassing Screen of 4cx800a for 50 MHz
>
>
> >
> > For what it's worth, I checked with Svetlana a while back about this and
> > they told me that their socket made for the 4CX800 with the built-in
> bypass
> > was good to 150 MHz.
> >
> > Frank
> > W2FCA
> >
> > ----------
> > > From: W6NQ <w6nq@rfparts.com>
> > > To: amps@contesting.com
> > > Subject: [AMPS] Bypassing Screen of 4cx800a for 50 MHz
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> > > Date: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:15
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone had any experience with the Svetlana 4cx800A at 50 MHz?
> > > How critical was method of screen bypass cap?
> > > Thanks
> > > Merit
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> > > Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> > > Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > > Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> >
> > --
> > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> > Submissions: amps@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
> >
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|