To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] RMS Power |
From: | Peter.Chadwick@zarlink.com (Peter Chadwick) |
Date: | Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:34:17 -0000 |
I think the idea of calling it 'rms power' is to distinguish it from 'PEP' or 'Peak power', or from'average power'. In the latter case, it's obvious for a steady carrier, but the 'average' power output of a morse transmitter if measured as a time average, is very variable for a given PEP. Another set of dumb things that that annoy are 'a.c. current', 'd.c. current' and 'I.F. frequency' But isn't 'DD50' a particular US Navy destroyer? 73 Peter G3RZP |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] RMS Power, Gary Schafer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] RMS Power, Peter Chadwick |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] RMS Power, Gary Schafer |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] RMS Power, <n2uf@joeham.net (Joseph DiPietro) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |