Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] SB220 Improvements

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] SB220 Improvements
From: 2 at vc.net (2)
Date: Fri Feb 14 11:49:53 2003

>
>On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:43:40 -0800 2 <2@vc.net> writes:
>>Eric -- You need to quote back the lines which you are responding to.  
>>Fairure to do so on a discussion group is not considered to be very 
>>Magnificent.
>
>Got a love it!
>
>>>I just tried to locate an official data sheet for this tube, but I 
>>could not 
>>>find one anywhere. However, my Radio Amateur's Handbook lists this 
>>tube as 
>>>having an 'operating range' of 110MHZ, which I assume they took from 
>>some 
>>>mfrs. data sheet.
>
>I found one thru www.google.com in c. 1min & 10ms?
>
>>Correct.  The spec sheets say full ratings to 110MHz for oscillator 
>>and 
>>amplifier service.
>>If you want a spec sheet I can scan one and send it via e-mail.
>>
>>>Are you claiming that they sell this tube to the user with full 
>>knowledge 
>>>that it possesses a very harmful resonance WITHIN its specified 
>>operating 
>>>range? 
>>
>>I have no knowledge of what they know about grid resonance.  However, 
>>every grid in this universe has c. 10nH per inch of total conductor 
>>length, and some capacitance to the other elements  - which together 
>>exhibit a L/C resonant frequency.  Below this resonant frequency, a 
>>grounded grid acts as an effective shield between the output and the 
>>input of the amplifier .  Above the resonant frequency, the grid looks 
>>more and more like an inductor.  At some point, oscillation may be 
>>possible due to the extant feedback C - which, for a 3-500Z is c. 
>>0.15pF. 
>
>And stray XC, of value and unavoidable in practice, please keep
>your hands in your pockets and off it's knobs, after all there are
>better things there to fiddle with...
>   
>>-  Eimac's W. B. Foote told me that their job is to design and produce 
>>tubes.  He said that stability is the job of the engineer who designs 
>>amplifiers.
>
>He forgot tube sockets didn't he?

**  There is very little C between the anode and the cathode pins on the 
socket unless a Masonite? chassis is employed.
>
>>--  Murphy was right -- "Nothing is as simple as it first looks".
>
>This guy Murphy really enjoys his job way too much...
>
**  The subject of human foibles can make for some fairly good laughs.

>>>Like if FORD sold you an car knowing full well that it possessed an 
>>>(undamped) front end resonance that would be excited at 70MPH?
>>
>>So far, Ford managed to sell Pintos and Crown Victorias with 
>>vulnerable 
>>gasoline tanks, numerous gas engine models with electronic ignitions 
>>that 
>>would go belly-up on a hot day, and 15-passenger vans which they 
>>discovered had a roll-over problem on the test track.   Ford 
>>management 
>>concealed the test results.   My guess is that this sort of thing goes 
>>
>>all the way back to the Model T.  Henry Ford was apparently a steller 
>>example of a man possessed by corporate ethics.
>>>
>>cheerz, Eric
>
>Didn't Henry like to fund Adolf also?  

**  As I understand it, Henry was pro-Adolph in the late 1930s because 
both of 'em passionately hated Jewish bankers as well as lox.  However, 
when Henry saw the mountain of money he could effortlessly make building 
B-24 bombers for the war effort, he had a change in heart, and he set up 
the famous mile-long B-24 Rouge River production line that was cranking 
out a plane every 25-minutes. When the smoke cleared, the B-24 was The  
most produced airplane during the war.  If all 16,000 or so had been 
lined up wing-tip to wing-tip, the shadow would have been c. 1.5Mega 
feet, or 300-miles, long -- roughly the distance between Santa Barbara 
and San Francisco.

>And if so what kinda ethics
>specifically are those types called in laymans terms?
>
**  Money is way more important than humans.  Ken Lay's Enron Corp. was a 
recent example.  American drug companies are a steller example.  For 
them, a 3000% profit is the American way, and, as old-folks know, a damn 
good way to be able to afford to buy Congress.  
>
>Enjoy Rich!
>
**  I'm trying, I'm trying.
>
>BTW, off topic, I'll bet FORD is going to be first out with
>a Hydro-generation X car.  

**  BMW has already built a hydrogen powered prototype that didn't toast 
test drivers.  

>Another term used for a wheeling
>flashpoint. I predict it'll kill millions.

**  Hydrogen gas is lighter than air, so if there a leak, it's outta 
there.  
Gasoline and especially propane vapours are way more dangerous because 
they settle on the floor and can blow one plumb out the garage door.
>
 cheers,  Jerry   

-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>