Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] proposed rule changes about amps
From: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Reply-to: wrt@dslextreme.com
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 16:11:22 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Sat, 29 May 2004 08:49:04 -0700, R.Measures wrote:

>for example, a typical electronic 
>telephone requires c. 5¢ worth of additional resistors at the inputs of 
>its ICs to make it immune to strong radio signals.    On a billion 
>telephones, a nickel per unit is $50-megabucks saved.

_________________________________________________________

The show stopper isn't the cost of the parts, it's the cost of the
engineering and testing as well as the possible penalties if units get
out in the field and are found to be out of compliance.  The nickel for
the resistor is the least of the equation.

--
Bill, W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>