Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service

To: "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 04:12:33 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

On Aug 26, 2004, at 12:18 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote:


Will Matney wrote:

The Fluke Model 61 is $109. It shines a laser beam where it is measuring the temp.
http://www.newark.com/product-details/text/CD121/49571.html


Will miracles never cease! I never thought I would see the day a Fluke instrument would be that cheap. I figured that being a Fluke would have been $350 to $450 dollars. Thanks for the info on this Rich, I may just get one of these myself! The model 65 is only $289 and has memory with temp conversion. The 61 is really all ones needs without getting extras. That would come in handy around the house checking for heat or cooling leaks around windows and doors. I would like this for not only checking tube temperatures but the temps on transformer coils and cores.

Sorry, but miracles are still in short supply. IR thermometers have several weaknesses, and all the cheaper models (including the Fluke 561) have an additional major problem: they assume a fixed value for the thermal emissivity of the surface they're looking at. If that fixed value is incorrect, the computed temperature reading will be incorrect too.


The Fluke 61 assumes 0.95, which is good for many kinds of dull surfaces, but the emissivity of bright metal surfaces can be significantly lower than that, so the meter will read low too.

Ian -- Agreed, however, the solution is: do not have the dull-gray anode stem chrome-plated on the 3-500Z.

You can of course calibrate the meter by pre-heating a similar surface to a temperature that you're also measuring some other way, but on a fixed-emissivity instrument the temperature error will not be constant - the error itself will vary with temperature. With a more expensive variable-emissivity instrument, you still have to do the same calibration, but there is an emissivity setting that you can adjust to make the meter show the true temperature; it will then read true across the whole range.


However, the three types of measurement that we're most interested in happen to be the three very worst cases for any kind of IR thermometer - even the most expensive.

1. Air temperature: you can't measure it with an IR thermometer - you'll always see the temperature of the surface behind the air current. Alternatively, you have to put some small object into the air current so it takes up the same temperature as the air, and then measure that object.

2. Shiny objects: anything that looks like a mirror has a very poor emissivity. It also *is* a mirror, so the IR energy may be coming from something else, reflected by the object you're trying to measure. (I guess a laser pointer might be a good warning that this may be happening.)

3. Glass - even worse than metal!

All these weaknesses come together if you're trying to measure the anode temperature of a 4-Something or a 3-500Z. *You* can see the anode glowing behind the glass, but what the IR thermometer sees will be anybody's guess.

The Fluke 61 has a laser beam pointer. end

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>