To: | "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service |
From: | Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | garyschafer@comcast.net |
Date: | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:01:22 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
The "carrier" that you hear on these signals is probably not carrier but
inband IM products from the low frequency audio signals. Listen closely
and you will see that it is only present with modulation. As to opposite side band suppression, with a filter, the low frequencies are not attenuated by the filter as much as the higher frequencies. Because they are closer to the pass band of the filter. Not as far down the skirt. So more get through on the unwanted side band. Especially when the base is boosted. With a phasing type of side band generation the problem comes from inadequate phase linearity at the low frequencies. Then add in the inband (audio) IM products and the apparent side band suppression really gets bad. No I am not an advocate of limited bandwidth either. Experimentation is great. There are more "better" sounding stations on the air as a result of the experimentation. It has a ways to go as far as being "clean" but it is no worse sounding than some of those awful appliances with "special" microphones designed to "cut through the qrm". They can make your ears bleed. 73 Gary K4FMX Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: Not at all. Why? A. the > 3 khz guys are almost all using digital phase cancellation methods for sideband generation therefore there is no carrier and no opposite sideband to suppress.
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Dentron GLA-1000A, bb |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service, Bill Fuqua |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service, Paul Christensen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |