| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Re: AMPS Link coupling |
| From: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <G3SEK@ifwtech.co.uk> |
| Reply-to: | "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk> |
| Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:03:43 +0000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
G3RZP wrote:
>>Rich wrote >>There is no antenna matching network that has a lower Q than an L->>network. > Ignoring the unloaded Qs of the individual components from which a network can be constructed... The minimum possible *loaded* Q that is required to transform between two resistances R2>R1, using any possible circuit, is sqrt(R2/R1 -1). The L-network has exactly that value of loaded Q, so it is correct that no other network can go lower (at least for resistive loads; not sure about impedances in general).
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Testing a tuner, Tomm Aldridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] g-g amps, carl seyersdahl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Re: AMPS Link coupling, Tomm Aldridge |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Re: AMPS Link coupling, Steve Thompson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |