Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BULK] - Re: [Amps] Why price difference/30S1

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [BULK] - Re: [Amps] Why price difference/30S1
From: "Jim Isbell, W5JAI" <jim.isbell@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Jim.Isbell@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:13:37 -0600
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Yes, but even though its a collectors item it is cheaper than an
equivilent "NEW" amp so you get a good amp AND you dont have
depreciation AND you save $1000 to $1500


On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:47:01 -0800, Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com> wrote:
> 30S1 = "collector's" amp, actual value is based on collectability, kind of
> like an old MG.
> 
> NTITAI, I should have kept my 1967 Austin-Healy 3000 Mk III.  It never ran
> worth a crap, but I see ones today in lesser condition than mine was
> (purchased used but mint cdx in '69 for $2500) selling at auction for over
> $70,000.  Darn!
> 
> -WB2WIK/6
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bob finger [mailto:finger@goeaston.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:45 AM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [BULK] - Re: [Amps] Why price difference/30S1
> 
> And does not include 160, nor does it have fast t/r switching desireable
> today.  Pretty amp tho. 73 bob de w9ge
> 
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 


-- 
Jim Isbell
W5JAI
UltraVan #257
CAL - 27   #221
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>