To: | Paul Whatton <paul.whatton@ntlworld.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration? |
From: | Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | garyschafer@comcast.net |
Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:02:12 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Paul Whatton wrote: > Gee guys this Bird 43 accuracy debate is so sad. And it misses the > point. In countries around the World radio amateurs knew they were > buying the best. The certainty that Bird 43 with a 2.5kW slug in the > feeder brought them made their station better and actually helped them > work that DX! > > And now you are trying to destroy all those dreams! Have you all no shame? > > The 43 comes from the modernist school of design, a time when things > were right, shouldn't be questioned and there was no uncertainty. To some it is like a religion. To even think of questioning it you will be accused of blasphemy. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration?, Paul Whatton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration?, R . Measures |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration?, Paul Whatton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Bird Element Calibration?, Gary Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |