Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] MTBF Thread...

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] MTBF Thread...
From: Ian White G/GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Reply-to: Ian White GM3SEK <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:41:22 +0100
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
David Kirkby wrote:
>Someone had a disk failure, and asked the question "how do they get 
>those huge MTBS's" or similar.
>
>I replied they (MTBF's which seem to vary between 500,00 and 1.4 
>million hours) assume you replace the device at the end of a service 
>life, which is typically 5 years. So it basically tells you the mean 
>time you will have to wait for a failure if you throw lots of usable 
>disks away.
>

It would be much better if they said: "Within the service life of this 
product, the average odds are 500,000 to 1 against it failing in any 
particular 1-hour period."

But even though this may be technically correct, it obviously takes no 
account of Murphy's Law...


-- 
73 from Ian G/GM3SEK
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>