Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] transformer talk

To: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Amps] transformer talk
From: KD7QAE <KD7QAE@ARRL.NET>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:36:50 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
These are the ranges of the value Irms under most conditions of winding 
and capacitor and wiring leakage inductance and series resistance as 
developed by theory.  For a design point I would suggest using Irms = 
2Idc.  Steve is correct.

Tomm

Steve Thompson wrote:

>KD7QAE wrote:
>  
>
>>For the major types of filters the secondary RMS current is related to 
>>the DC load current as:
>>
>>Inductor input: 0.7
>>FWCT capacitor input: 1.0 to 1.2
>>FWB capacitor input: 1.6 to 1.8
>>
>>Data from O.H. Schrade: "Analysis of Rectifier Operation"
>>    
>>
>I agree these are the ranges of figures that 'drop out' most often - but 
>I'd caution against automatically assuming that they cover every 
>instance. In the last case, if you have 1.9 instead of an assumed 1.7, 
>there's 25% more heat.
>
>In the absence of using PSU Designer or somesuch to predict values, 
>0.7xIdc for choke input and 1.7xIdc for capacitor input are also useful 
>estimates of the rms ripple current in the smoothing caps.
>
>Steve
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>