Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such

To: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such
From: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:00:55 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Joe Isabella wrote:

> Since when does management listen to engineers??  They listen to  
> the mighty $$$$.  Just like the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster  
> chain of events, the engineers said "NO!!", but management said  
> "We'll lose millions!!", so they launched with frozen O-rings.  We  
> lost more than millions...

Amen, Joe.  They were also under pressure from the Administration to  
launch for political timing reasons.
>
> If you want a "perfect" amp, build it yourself.

Indeed, Joe.  The last amplifier that I built was an 8169 in AB1.   I  
tried to do everything perfect based on what I learned from blunders  
I made during the Plywood Box project, but two mistakes turned up:   
1.  I did not install one wire that was on the diagram, so nutti'  
happened when I turned it on. and 2.  I got a HV-RFC resonance too  
close to 14MHz, which caused a choke fire.

> Better yet, let's all do that, swap hardware, and see how perfect  
> they are!!  Bet you a cup of coffee none of 'em are...
>
> :-)
>
> Joe, N3JI
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Gary Smith <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
> To: craxd1@verizon.net; amps@contesting.com
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:26:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such
>
>
> Coming from Mr Matney, a most excellent point of view.   
> Particularly where
> one could be sued into bankruptcy and then oblivion.
> Gary...wa6fgi
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 5:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such
>
>
>> It's according to what kind of audio amp. Guitar amps are designed to
>> purposely introduce distortion. That's where the squeal of the  
>> electric
>> guitar comes from. The bands actually prefer this. However, if one  
>> is an
>> engineer, and you have a maximum rating curve, it is a liability  
>> to ever
>> go outside the curve into the over load region. That's like saying  
>> I'll
>> put my stamp on this bridge which I know is going to deflect more  
>> than
>> allowable published tolerances, and that I think it can get by  
>> with the
>> added stress, even though I am over the maximum curves for tensile  
>> and
>> yield strength. Then an automobile drives over it and falls in the  
>> river.
>> Who's liable? Whether electrical or mechanical engineering, an  
>> engineer
>> should always look at this. Though running a tube out of spec  
>> probably
>> wont kill anyone, the manufacturer better be ready to replace  
>> tubes or the
>> entire amp if the customer is dissatisfied as a suit will sure  
>> follow if
>> they don't. If ran in spec, one has nothing to worr
>> y about, and has published data to fall back on. This from an  
>> engineers
>> point of view.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Will
>>
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>>
>> On 6/25/06 at 4:00 PM k7fm wrote:
>>
>>> Tom said:
>>>
>>> "I think you are really saying an engineer shouldn't ever
>>> design outside what is actually published on a spec sheet
>>> that only covers a limited number of situations under any
>>> condition, even if the component manufacturer, field
>>> history, or direct testing show otherwise."
>>>
>>> It might be easier to grasp what Tom is saying if you think of audio
>>> amplifiers.  Assume a tube manufacturer specifies a tube for audio
>>> distortion.  However, the manufacturer of the audio amplifier is  
>>> looking
>>> for
>>> minimum distortion.  If he finds that running the tube outside of  
>>> the
>>> curves
>>> specified by the tube manufacturer gives consistently lower  
>>> distortion,
>>> then
>>> it would be good engineering to do so.   In some cases, tubes  
>>> might be
>>> hand
>>> selected for those parameters that met the goals of the  
>>> engineer.  In some
>>> cases, the plate dissipation might be exceeded to get closer to  
>>> class A.
>>>
>>> Colin  K7FM
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>