Bob,
It was actually corrected last night, but seeing as my posts are being held up,
it didn't show until today. When I screwed up on that, I figured they were
talking about the external pressure as compared to the internal vacuum. When I
re-read the article, I seen where I had left out the exponent. Sorry about
that, I just skimmed over that text the first time and didn't catch it all
until last night.
Best,
Will
>*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>On 7/29/06 at 4:29 PM BIRCHWAY@aol.com wrote:
>It's not UNDER PRESSURE..............it's A VACUUM................minus 10
>atmospheres
>would be more accurate......Bob...W0PQX.....
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|