Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Grid vs cathode driven

To: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Grid vs cathode driven
From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Reply-to: craxd1@verizon.net
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 10:11:31 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Peter,

Why would one want to go through all the trouble with sweep tubes on that when 
10 of them can be ran grid driven? The Galaxy amateur amp was a good example
of this. I have built them using as high as 10 in G-G in parallel. No 
neutralization
was necessary, and they ran just fine. I've used as high as 4 grid driven, they 
did
ok too. I'd try this first before do that arrangement.

Best,

Will

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 8/4/06 at 10:13 AM Peter Chadwick wrote:

>Hsu said:
>>I think we can use similar design in RF amplifier, add a wide band HV RF
>transformer to change the push-pull output to single end output, so we can
>use same Pi network as same as single end 811A GG amplifier,even we can
>useing RF transformer reduce the output impedance, so we can use
>inexpensive low volt air capacitor(reciving caps).simple input net work,
>withou screen and grid PS, cheap out put Pi network,it seems very perfect
>amplifier!<
>I would be very dubious about the practicality of making the transformer.
>You're looking for a wideband transformer from about 13k ohm or so down to
>whatever, and that means a lot of primary inductance, and thus capacity
>(because of the number of turns) You also need a lot of ferrite to avoid
>saturation. With a low impedance arrangement ( say a lot of sweep tubes)
>it becoems more practial because the impedance is lower.
>73
>Peter G3RZP
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>