Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Tuned Input - IMD and efficiency

To: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Tuned Input - IMD and efficiency
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:20:10 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:44:54 +0100, you wrote:


>As an aside, adding some capacitance with low inductance leads from 
>cathode to grid won't only help linearity/efficiency, it might improve 
>vhf stability too.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

This makes perfect sense. Rich recommends a 33pF in series with a ten
ohm resistor directly from grid to cathode with short leads. That is
what I used in my 8877 amp and it is perfectly stable without any
anode parasitic suppressor at all. Do not leave out the resistor; it
lowers the Q of any parasitic resonant circuit and thereby lowers the
gain.

I think where people run into trouble in the grid area is with long
leads running to the input circuit, be it a switch or relays. It
doesn't take very many inches of wire or coax to create a VHF
resonance of about the same frequency as the anode resonance, and then
you have a classic TGTP oscillator, whether grid-driven or
cathode-driven. If you can move the grid resonance up way higher than
the anode resonance, the amp will be stable, and the 33pf/10 ohm will
help damp any fed-back VHf energy in the first place. 

I wish there was an easy way to quantify all this, but each amp is
different. This is as much art as science, IMO.

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>