Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag

To: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Amps] Parasitics & Filament Sag
From: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 11:03:20 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Sep 3, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Peter Chadwick wrote:

> Rich said:
>
> > If an L-network was resonant on the operating frequency,  infinite
> current would flow through it because the reactive components are
> equal, opposite, in series, and not in parallel.<
>
> Only because of your non-rigorous definition of resonance.

XL = XC isn't rigorous enough on your side of the pond?

> AC theory tells us that the only definition of resonance that holds  
> for all cases is that the applied voltage and current are in phase.  
> The 'XL=XC' definition is a very loose approximation, and falls  
> over badly when Q is low. There are occasions where it doesn't  
> matter, but for an understanding of what is happening, it is  
> necessary to appreciate the inherent errors in the approximation.  
> The difference can be very important where feedback is applied,  
> because a tuning error can lead to instability.
>
> Ian says that in practice, it doesn't matter. Not to the  appliance  
> operator, I suppose.
>
> 73
>
> Peter G3RZP
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>