Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] NOS 4CX1000A test and reconditioning

To: "'Paul Christensen'" <w9ac@arrl.net>,"'Amps Amps'" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] NOS 4CX1000A test and reconditioning
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:40:29 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Paul, 

> Since most commercial broadcast transmitters use directly-heated 
> cathodes, warm-up time is not much of an issue.  Many transmitters 
> use time-delays that far exceed what is required in order to apply 
> excitation to the PA and IPA.  That said, glass tubes used at HF 
> may fare better than the example described above, but the cost v. 
> benefit cannot be justified even in the most intensely competitive 
> major markets.

Most of the TV transmitters used indirectly heated filaments that 
had significant warm-up time.  Timers were typically 10 to 15 
minutes although manufacturers often specified the filament time 
at 5 to 7 minutes. 

When spots in an NCAA "Final Four," Super Bowl, "local" university 
football game, World Series, etc. were going for enough that the 
loss of revenue from one 2 minute local break may have represented 
the salary of the most highly compensated staff person, "hot 
stand-by" was not even a question. 

Now that most UHF transmitters use paralleled amplifiers to make 
the necessary power levels and most of the new VHF transmitters 
are solid state a "hot standby" isn't as common but I know a few 
places that still run them. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
      

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>