Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] SB200??

To: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] SB200??
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:34:59 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
You continuosly ask that question and have been given plenty of answers in 
the past by several. Werent they good enough for you?

If you cant even get a SB-200 to work on HF then you are not ready for 6M. 
Read the manual for operating parameters....

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 6:21 PM
Subject: [Amps] SB200??


> The useful answer is that the 572B works very well at 6M and a SB-200
> works very well there also if you understand amplifiers. No rocket
> science required.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>                I am not disputing anyones claims, BUT , I sure would
> like to have some PROOF, as well as some answers as to how the amp is
> being operated, IE: HV, plate current, Grid current, ETC.!!!  PLUS,
> Stability questions that have been  raised here before !!!!!
>        Also , what has been done to quantify to the IMD, actual output
> power , vs input power,
> ETC.!! You are not the only one who is at question here , my friend.!!!
> I have worked on many SB200's and had problems with so many of them on
> 10 mtrs.  I do not , and never did, profess to be an expert on these
> amps, or any others,BUT, I had always hoped that at least on this one
> reflector I'd find the answers I'm seeking.
>          I'm sending this msg. to the entire group in hopes that at
> least "one' of you out there can help me .!!!!!
>            carl / kz5ca
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>