Indeed so, Doc, but at least there's a spec difference between the original and
A and B
variants....hehehe
Cheers
John
kd4e <doc@kd4e.com>
09/25/2007 02:11 PM
To
john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com
cc
Please respond to amps@contesting.com
doc@kd4e.com
Subject
Re: Tube Standardization [Was]
Stability of
amps
This is an interesting topic, isn't it true that
6146's varied within some of the series - the "B"
in particular, or was it the "A"?
It is also a problem with many modern devices where
a manufacturer will change a chipset in the middle
of a series with no evidence anywhere in the packaging
that such has happened.
Wreaks havoc when one has designed in reference to
one chipset and one receives another!
> Unless someone took the time to document why it was (with numbers)
> the one tube worked and the other didn't , then I'd suggest the
> answer is "no"... it's not good engineering practice. Unless you
> fully understand the difference between the two, can quantify it and
> put it in the specification, you'd have not guaranteed that the next
> lot of tubes from the GOOD manufacturer, would not suddenly stop
> working. John K5MO
--
Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
Personal: http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for SPAM content and Viruses by the MessageL
abs Email Security System.
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|