I didnt mention it since QST and the Handbooks had FW bridge circuits shown
for QRO way back into the early 30's.
However your point is still valid even more so today as the insulation
deteriorates.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Gable" <EGABLE@Rochester.rr.com>
To: "W5CUL" <w5cul@sbcglobal.net>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Need help understanding an old Transformer
>I concur with interesting comments on this thread. No one has mentioned
> that a full wave bridge with an ungrounded center tap is not an option
> using
> these old transformers. The transformers were designed and built to have
> the CT grounded and the insulation often will not withstand the high
> voltage
> at the ungrounded terminal. Some old timers used to mount the
> transformers
> off ground on porcelain insulators to keep the potential difference
> between
> the case and the CT at a safer level. Maybe that's why we don't have as
> many old timers - hihi.
>
> 73, /Ed Gable k2mp
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "W5CUL" <w5cul@sbcglobal.net>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 12:18 PM
> Subject: [Amps] Need help understanding an old Transformer
>
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I need some help in determining the capability of an old transformer that
>> I
>> ran across. It is an old Thordarson CHT Series built some time in the
>> late
>> 30's early 40's. The model number is T-15P21 and it weighs about 129lbs,
>> and was designed for continuous commercial service (CCS) at its rated
>> output. What has me confused is how to determine its overall rated
>> capability. It is an old style with a Center Tap on the secondary's, and
>> plenty of Sec taps for various voltages. I actually found an old
>> Thordarson
>> catalog which gives somewhat of a clue, but I suspect that I may not be
>> reading it right. Here is what it says in the catalog for the T-15P21:
>>
>>
>>
>> Sec A.C D.C D.C
>> Pri. Pri.
>>
>> Load Volts Volts M.A.
>> Volts Watts
>>
>>
>>
>> 3440/3440 3000 500
>> 115-230 1690
>>
>> 2980/2980 2500
>>
>> 2340/2340 2000
>>
>> 1815/1815 1500
>>
>>
>>
>> So what I am thinking, and please correct me if I am wrong, I would see
>> 3440
>> Vac between either secondary leg and CT, or if across both 3440 secondary
>> legs, I would see 6880Vac. The "3000" D.C Volts shown in the catalog is
>> only for one leg to CT and is rated low due to an older method of
>> rectifying; basically using a smoothing choke with one or two diodes.
>> The
>> .5mA at 3000Vdc rating is across only one of the 3440 secondary legs to
>> CT,
>> with the other 3440 secondary leg to CT capable of the same amperage
>> simultaneously. Or, if across both 3440 secondary legs with no center
>> tap,
>> the transformer could supply .5mA CCS at 6000Vdc, given a smoothing
>> choke.
>> I also suspect that the 1690 Watts primary is in keeping with the one
>> 3440
>> secondary leg to CT, even though it is under the Primary column, thus
>> giving
>> a full rating across the primaries if both 3440 secondary legs were to be
>> utilized simultaneously to that of 3380 Watts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Let me know if I am on the right track or if I am missing something here.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the help!!
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> W5CUL
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|