Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Odd efficiency shift on 80m band

To: TexasRF@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Odd efficiency shift on 80m band
From: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:21:45 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
We all seem to forget that the 80m band has the largest % of range of  
all the HF bands.

160m = 1.8 - 2.0 = 11% bandwidth
80m = 3.5 - 4.0 = 14% bandwidth
40m = 7.0 - 7.3 =  4% bandwidth
30m = 10.1 - 10.15 = .5% bandwidth
20m = 14.0 - 14.350 = 2.5% bandwidth
17m = 18.068 - 18.168 = .6% bandwidth
15m = 21.0 - 21.450 = 2.1% bandwidth
12m = 24.89 - 24.99 = .4% bandwidth
10m = 28.0 - 29.7 = 6% bandwidth

With such a large bandwidth %, it is no wonder that circuit designs  
just don't work 'flat' across the whole band.

I'll leave it to the experts who can talk about Q, etc .. across that band.

Don
N8DE


Quoting TexasRF@aol.com:

> Just curious: is the lowered efficiency because power output is reduced or
> because the plate input power has increased, or a combination of both?
>
> 73,
> Gerald K5GW
>
>
> In a message dated 3/11/2009 3:35:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> keepwalking188@yahoo.com writes:
>
>
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219671244x1201345076/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>