... sorry, but something really doesn't fit!
RG 213 has a withstand voltage closer to 6000 (six thousand) volts rather
than 600!
Alex 4Z5KS
-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Rex Lint
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 4:02 AM
To: dezrat1242@yahoo.com; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] High SWR
Huh? 600 Volts? Where did that figure come from?
-Rex-
K1HI
Rex Lint
Merrimack, NH
-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:53 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] High SWR
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:39:22 -0400, Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
wrote:
>, but SWR, per se, is not
>something to worry yourself about, so long as the amplifier can match the
load.
REPLY:
I agree up to a point. The main villain with SWR, IMO, isn't loss, it
is the excess voltage present on the line. Most coax, even the RG-213
size, is rated for only 600 volts. If you have a 2:1 SWR at 1500 watts
you are living on the edge already. Go to 3:1 and you have crossed the
line.
I won't say it can't be done, but a wise op won't.
73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|