Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (Results of experiment)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (Results of experiment)
From: "pc5m, Carel" <pc5m@xs4all.nl>
Reply-to: pc5m@xs4all.nl
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:15:41 +0100
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
That's a pitty Larry :-)

Reason for asking is that (maybe you have seen my post) I did basically the
same experiment. However, with opposite result!
Only difference I can see is that I didn't had a through hole....

I might change my experiment to a vertical setup.

Gl, Carel.

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Larry Benko
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 7:34 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (Results of
experiment)

Darn, I just finished cleaning up the experiment and it is now in the 
trash.  I didn't think there were any follow up test to do.  I did the 
test at 33% and 66% of the distance from the center and am quite sure 
that doing it at 75% or 80% will result in an even lower resonant 
frequencies with a lower real part to the feedpoint impedance at 
resonance.  As far as soldering wires to disks without a hole I really 
believe there would be no change since I soldered a fillet to both sides 
of the disks before.  However I will let someone else have a turn with 
this test if anyone wishes.  The test could be more easily done with a 
short vertical on a metal plate.

Larry, W0QE

Roger wrote:
> pc5m, Carel wrote:
>   
>> Hi Larry,
>>
>> Could you repeat your experiment with a subtle change: don't drill a hole
>> through the discs but solder/connect the wire on both sides ? I think it
>> will change your results. 
>>   


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>