Its been my experience at places Ive worked is that incoming inspection tests L
and C at 1kHz using HP equipment.
I suspect that 1 kHz is an industry standard going back to the 1 kc days. What
the part does at another frequency is up to the engineer using it to determine.
Back in the days of the black arts and slide rules it was called the fudge
factor.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack/W6NF
To: Carl
Cc: Larry Benko ; amps@contesting.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] LCR meter
D'OH...of course, I should have thought of that with the inductors.
However, I am seeing discrepancies on capacitors, as well. For example, a
good quality 5kv mica, rescued from a salvaged broadcast transmitter, has
measured 2200pf (it's rated value) at 500kHz, about 1900pf at 1MHz and 1700 pf
at 1.8MHz. That certainly has me puzzled.
Let's see if there's a response that rates another D'OH :>)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
It would be interesting to see what a 1kHz instrument would read with that
same core.
A 2 mix is a poor performer at 50kHz and you might be reading true
inductance.
Also at 30 mHz it only takes a few turns in the typical input network. At 6M
the 6 mix is the core of choice.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Benko" <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] LCR meter
> Here are some real numbers I just measured on a network analyzer
> calibrated at the plane of the core being measured.
>
> Core = T94-2 powdered iron u=10, 22 turns #18 occupying about 80% of core
>
> Msmt. freq. L(measured)
>
> 50KHz 3.06uH
> 100KHz 3.86uH
> 200KHz 4.53uH
> 500KHz 4.51uH
> 1MHz 4.50uH
> 5MHz 4.50uH
> 10MHz 4.58uH
> 20MHz 4.89uH
> 30MHz 5.52uH
> 40MHz 6.80uH
> 68.1MHz parallel resonant freq.
>
> As can be seen frequencies above 10MHz show the beginning effects of the
> parallel resonance and low measurement frequencies underestimate the
> inductance by a significant amount. Also mounting the inductor in a
> metal box will reduce the inductance. I suspect if the measurement freq.
> was 1KHz the values would be even lower. I always measure near the
> frequency I intend to use the inductor at and if possible with the
> inductor mounted in the enclosure. Then calibrating to the inductor
> plane gives the "real" inductance and filters and matching networks come
> out as predicted.
>
> 73,
> Larry, W0QE
>
>
>
>
> Vic K2VCO wrote:
>> On 3/30/2010 4:47 AM, Jack/W6NF wrote:
>>
>>> I have used an HP LCR meter at work but never paid any attention to the
>>> frequency at which the measurement is made. I wonder what discrepancies
>>> in
>>> measurement values of L and C could be encountered if one measured at
>>> various RF frequencies, and why they might occur. I have seen such
>>> discrepancies, using a popular antenna analyzer, even though I was
>>> careful
>>> not to introduce sources of error, like lead lengths.
>>>
>>
>> If the coil has a ferrite or iron core of any kind, the inductance varies
>> a lot with
>> frequency. Inductors with cores must be measured near the operating
>> frequency. And in
>> general, as you raise the frequency the various stray capacitances and
>> inductances in the
>> device under test become more significant.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
--
Jack, W6NF
Silver Springs, NV
DM09ji
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|