Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 2 x 4-1000 supressor.

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 2 x 4-1000 supressor.
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:06:20 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 2 x 4-1000 supressor.


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:44:40 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Measures voodo has zero engineering behind it and is strictly brute force.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Nonsense. Rich's suppressors have been thoroughly analyzed by some
> very competent engineers. Whether or not one agrees with his
> philosophy, he HAS done his homework.
>
> I can only wonder what drives Carl to make ridiculous statements like
> the above. Truly bizarre.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>

They have been analyzed all right by competent engineers and engineering 
college professors long before you unfortunately migrated to this forum. 
Measures voodo has been derided by all and used by none in industry. That 
says it all right there.

You continue to show that your qualifications are on the same par as 
Measures. Maybe thats why you ran away from Yahoo, couldnt stand the heat.

Carl
KM1H


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>