Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] DIN vs N

To: <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] DIN vs N
From: Shane Youhouse <kd6vxi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:29:18 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Take an Amphenol rt angle PL259 apart.  Your opinion may change :)

I had 2 fail mobile, turns out they where TINY springs for the interconnect.  


Transistors have ratings, tubes have guidelines!

--Shane  
Kilowatt Delta Six Victor Xray India

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 04:20 PM
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] DIN vs N

On 4/24/2011 8:19 PM, jeff millar wrote:
> It used a DIN 7/16 on the GS-35b amp with a DIN to N adapter.
> We debugged it to the an open circuit in the adapter. On dismantling the 
> adapter
> it had a very small pin, about the same diameter as 18 to 20 gauge wire that
> connected between the larger pins for the N and DIN sides. This adapter was 
> one
> of hundreds that became surplus from the cellular industry.

I wouldn't blame this on the cell phone industry -- you just got 
suckered by JUNK connectors. Don't feel like the Lone Ranger -- I did 
too, buying a bunch at hamfests about 8 years ago. Caused me no end of 
problems. Not limited to DIN to N adapters -- all sorts of adapters are 
this sort of junk. Elbows, Tees, BNC to N, BNC to PL259, PL259 to N, and 
so on. This garbage falls apart, burns up, goes intermittent, etc.

Many of us have learned the hard way -- nothing but Amphenol. Period.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>