Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments

To: "Gene May" <gene-may@hotmail.com>, "Amplifier Mailing List" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] PL-259 and SO-239 cable attachments
From: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:05:52 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

I know that SO239s do not have their metal connection "buried" as deeply
inside as female 115 VAC power sockets do, so don't furnish as much
protection from contact with a "hot" lead.  Still, how and/or why did we
depart from the power cord convention, when it would at least provide
some visual warning of a "hot" lead?
 
Gene May
WB8WKU

>>RF is different.  You can't get a shock from it.  You can get a
"burn," but you can get that by contacting a safely connected antenna,
including a mobile whip, directly from the antenna anyway -- so why
protect it elsewhere?

Also, cable-end females were never specified by the radio guide standard
(mil spec) for UHF type connectors (difficult design), only males were
(and panel mount/couplings/bulkheads for females).  Not certain why, but
might be because the weakness of that design is mostly in the female
receptacle, not in the male plug.

You can get cable-end female (and mil spec) connectors in Type N and
other designs.

-WB2WIK
                                          
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>