Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Electrical Distribution Methods

To: wlfuqu00@uky.edu, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Electrical Distribution Methods
From: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:52:27 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Thanks Bill, this is one of those concepts that is not apparent to the most 
 casual observer. I assume this is also the reason that 240v three phase  
systems have 208vac between legs?
 
It is a great day when you learn something new!
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/15/2013 8:36:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
wlfuqu00@uky.edu writes:

Actually, if you have only 2 connections to a 3 phase  system they are 180 
degrees relative to each other.
The 120 degree phase  relationship can only be observed with 3 connections. 
In that case one becomes  a reference
that the others are compared with. 
73
Bill  wa4lav


________________________________________
From: Amps  [amps-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of TexasRF@aol.com  
[TexasRF@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 11:14 AM
To:  w9ac@arrl.net; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Electrical  Distribution Methods

Hi Paul, probably showing my ignorance here but  isn't there a 120 degree
phase difference between any two legs of a three  phase power distribution
system?

Seems that might pose a problem  connecting the single primary of a
distribution  transformer.

73,
Gerald K5GW







In a  message dated 10/15/2013 7:40:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
w9ac@arrl.net  writes:

Peter,

That's a good explanation.

> With   Protective Multiple Earthing, provided there is enough  distributed
>  grounding of the neutral, that isn't a  problem.

That's an area of  concern of mine in one application of  the U.S.
electrical
distribution  system.  Many of us have  likely noticed that one terminal of
a
pole-mounted utility company  residential split-phase transformer is
connected to one of three hot phases  in a multi-phase distribution system
--
or single-phase distribution  where the one hot phase is split  from an
upstream three-phase  source.  In both cases, the primary  return is
connected
to  the Multi-Ground Neutral (MGN) messenger cable (AKA  "strand").   That
cable is bonded and earthed down each and every  utility  pole.  This cable
may also serve double-duty for attachment  of  either CATV or telephony
cables -- or where telephony and CATV is   separated on different strands,
they are periodically bonded   together.

It's unnerving to think that the bare copper bus wire  that  runs down each
pole is really connected to many, many KV and the  only  thing keeping a
barefooted kid safe when s/he touches an  accidentally  lifted/unearthed
ground wire is that (hopefully) the MGN  cable strand has  excellent
connectivity to earth on many poles up and  downstream from the  pole in
question.  I understand as a matter  of economics it must be  this way for
single-phase distribution as is  common in rural areas.   But when a
240V/120V
split-phase  transformer is hung on a three-phase  pole, why can't  the
primary
connect between two phases instead of one  phase and  the MGN?  I can't see
a
direct economic impact in this case   apart from perhaps better lightning
mitigation when one side of the   utility transformer primary is grounded.

Sorry for drifting the  subject  off even further (notice the new subject
line) but it's been  a nagging  question of mine.  In a past life, I was
Director of  Engineering for  several telecom and broadband firms and this
issue  was raised from  time-to-time (usually when a cable tech was  
injured)
with no clear answer  ever obtained from the utility  companies.

Paul, W9AC


-----  Original Message  -----
From: "peter chadwick"  <g8on@fsmail.net>
To:  <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday,  October 15, 2013 9:49  AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] More on two pin  220vac


> The  neutral is probably grounded at the distribution  transformer.  
That's
> likely to be a Y secondary and the centre point  is  'grounded' and forms
> the neutral. Depending on the load and how   much resistance there is in
the
> neutral, at any point along  the  distribution, the neutral voltage will
> rise above ground to  some  extent, so quite often, additional grounds are
> provided for  the  neutral. The problem comes if the neutral is ruptured:
> then  the  'load' side of the break is connected through the stoves,  A/C,
> radio  gear etc to the live side of the line and the  neutral, under these
>  fault conditions is up at line voltage with  respect to ground.
>
>  With Protective Multiple Earthing,  provided there is enough distributed
> grounding of the neutral, that  isn't a problem. Where the neutral is
> connected to the house ground  wiring, then you can get a problem,
because
> the stove, A/C etc  would love that ruptured neutral to have a  good
ground
>  connected to it. If that ground is the external radio  ground, all  the
> fault current wants to go there through the cable in  the  wall and the
> transceiver power cord which can't take 50 or 100   amps....for very long,
> anyway.
>
> So here, it is  allowed  for the property earth to be separate from the
> supply  'earthed'  neutral - and that's much safer in the ruptured  
neutral
>  situation.
>
> But different countries have  different methods. At  one time (and maybe
> even now) some outback  properties in Australia  used a ground return
> instead of a  neutral.....
>
> As  they say, 'there's more ways than one of  skinning a cat' - although
my
> cats don't believe in any of  them!
>
> I think Charles  should firstly check the schematic  to make sure that
there
> is nothing  getting power from one  side of the line and chassis -
although
> that's  not been  allowed for years and the amplifier probably wouldn't
work
>   anyway. The use a meter to check that BOTH mains leads are a very high
>  resistance to chassis - many megohms.
>
> Secondly, check   the wiring to make sure the interlock wiring is as it
> should be -  and  Lou has given some pretty definite directions on  that.
>
>  73
>
> Peter  G3RZP
>
>
>
>
>
>  73
>
>  Peter G3RZP
>
>
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing   list
> Amps@contesting.com
>   http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps  mailing   list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps  mailing  list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps  mailing  list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>