| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited |
| From: | donroden@hiwaay.net |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:08:27 -0600 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Quoting Robert Carroll <w2wg@comcast.net>: The point is if you match the transceiver and make it happy with a particular length of line, the SWR in the line is close to meaningless from a loss standpoint. THANK YOU ROBERT !! I was hoping that someone would pick up on this. If it works and Mr Smith gets mad, the bottom line is that it still works. Don W4DNR _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited, Robert Carroll |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited, Paul Christensen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited, Robert Carroll |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Input SWR revisited, Paul Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |