Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] New Amplifier

To: Amplifiers <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] New Amplifier
From: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 17:13:39 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
I am sorry, but the use of ..."100%
Duty Cycle"... and ICAS as equals
is a contradiction of terms.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:

> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:20:54 +0000 (UTC), Catherine wrote:
>
> > Heck, in what way is it superior to an AL-82 or AL-1500 at half the price
>
> REPLY:
>
> I can think of several ways where transistors are superior to tubes:
>
> 1. When not abused, transistors are far more reliable than tubes.
>
> 2. Safer. A 50 VDC supply is essentially harmless. 3 kV will kill you
> instantly.
>
> 3. No expensive filament transformer needed.
>
> 4. A 1500 watt transistor is cheaper than a 1500 watt tube.
>
> 5. No warm up time.
>
> 6. The amps you mentioned are not rated at 100% duty cycle at 1500
> watts of carrier (RTTY, FM, etc.) The PowerGenius XL is (ICAS).
>
> And no doubt there are others.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>