Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation

To: Amps group <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Ham Tests, was Price per Watt Conversation
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 03:17:17 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:07:40 -0700, Jim wrote:

>W6WRT is also active on JT65.

REPLY:

Further proof that time marches on. JT65, good as it is, has been
overtaken by JT9, which uses about a tenth the bandwidth and according
to the author is about 2 dB better with weak signals. Otherwise it is
virtually identical. Progress. 

The point is not to be tied to one mode just because in the olden days
it was the best. I'm not anti-CW, in fact I'm closing in on Honor Roll
CW and I prefer it for DXing, but in an emergency give me my Nerf
mike. :-)

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>