Antennaware
[Top] [All Lists]

[antennaware] Homebrew vertical construction

To: <antennaware@contesting.com>
Subject: [antennaware] Homebrew vertical construction
From: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed)
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 09:20:23 -0400
Good to hear from you,. L.B.,

A few follow-up comments...

----------
a.  In free space, where there are no reflections, the hat vertical has a
larger length of high current than the 1/4 wl w/gp.  Hence, for straight
out (tangential) radiation, we would expect higher gain relative to the
standard (dBi) than from the 1/4 wl w/gp.
-----------
Correct

------------
b.  Over ground, the hatted vertical has some interesting properties
relative to the way in which you set up the project.  Since the antenna
feedpoints--1/4 wl down from the top--are the same, we should look at the
radiation originating below that point.  

------------
The most notable thing about the "bottom hat" is how rapidly it falls off
in maximum gain, whether adding a small hat at the vertical dipole
end of the experiment, or shortening the 1/4 wave radials at the other
end.  It's gain is always below a straight line between the START and
END points.

------------
c.  The sloped radial (type 1) antenna is quite interesting

------------
I also considered that the sloped radials slightly skewed the main
lobe upwards, improving the summation with the reflected wave.

------------
d.  If you were working with higher altitudes for the antennas, 
This would be important if someone
replicates this experiment for 40 meters, for example.

------------
You're right -- a brief look at this scenario will convince anyone 
with that kind of available height to use a horizontal antenna.

-----------
e.  The maximum gain differential, although appearing very distinct, is
still about 1/2 dB or less than 0.1 S-unit

------------
True, although the best-to-worst ratio is 1 dB, which might be
statistically significant in, say, a contest situation. This difference would 
also be multiplied in an array, such as a four-square.

------------
f.  Average ground is in fact one of the lowest gain grounds over which a
vertical antenna system can be placed. 

-----------
Look at Georgia on your conductivity map!  "Average" ground is
better than I have under my antennas!

------------
g.  I concur that more radials in the models are useful to try, although
since you are using a wholly elevated system, You might make the increases
modest for each replication.

------------
An increase from four to eight is probably sufficient to establish
a trend.

-----------
I hope something in these notes will be useful to you.

----------
Yep!

73, Gary K9AY



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/antennaware-faq.html
Submissions:              antennaware@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  antennaware-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-antennaware@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>