Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Zero-point QSO's in CQWW |
---|---|
From: | thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com) |
Date: | Mon Nov 16 17:19:21 1998 |
Lee's point (AA4GA) is well taken. I always put zero point Q's in the log when working split on 40 SSB. I have logged some famous calls over the years. Shame on those that don't log them. I think that is a poor reflection on the station called. From the comments this has been duly noted and is to be corrected in the future. I think Lee will agree with the suggestion that anyone should log a DX station first then the zero point Q. I remember when a VP8 and a K0 answered at the same time. The VP8 went into the log and the K0 next after assuring no more DX. For one thing this helps keep the frequency clear of everything except BC. The way logs are checked today the stations not logging zero point Q's (or duplicate DX Q's) will stand out like sore thumbs. Don't join the shame list log those Q's! One year from a M/S the same guy called me at least 10 times...after the fourth SO I just put the guy on ignore...and thats hard to do when he is 15 over nine and the average Dx calling is S7 or 8. Dave K4JRB -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Zero-point QSO's in CQWW, K4ab@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Crippled FT1000MP query, Harper, David |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Zero-point QSO's in CQWW, K4ab@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Zero-point QSO's in CQWW, David Jones |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |