CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Contest this weekend

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Contest this weekend
From: w7ti@jps.net (Bill Turner)
Date: Sun Apr 1 20:09:44 2001
<Pine.GSO.4.10.10103312354360.13417-100000@bluestem.prairienet.org>
In-Reply-To: 
<Pine.GSO.4.10.10103312354360.13417-100000@bluestem.prairienet.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by contesting.com id 
f3229oW27498
Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com 
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C


On Sun, 1 Apr 2001 00:01:06 -0600 (CST), Zack Widup wrote:

 >I would like to propose a modification of the scoring rules.  For every
 >station participating in the contest that you DON'T work, you get a bonus
 >of 500,000 points.  However, in order to qualify, you must work at least
 >30% of the active participants.  To determine if you qualify for the
 >bonus, you must log both the stations you DO work and the stations
 >you DON'T work.  Therefore, EVERYONE in the contest must spend most of
 >the time calling CQ in order for everyone else to determine who all the
 >participants are.

_________________________________________________________

Finally, a rule that makes sense and is approved by Schizophrenics R Us.

I thank you and I thank you.

73, Bill W7TI's


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>